International Specialty Supply

Supplying Sprout Companies Throughout the World

 

ISS

820 East 20th Street

Cookeville, TN 38501 USA

931 526 1106

Bob@sproutnet.com

中文版

En espańol

 

 

Anti-cancer Potential of Asian Brassicas

Glucosinolates & Chemoprevention

 

  

 

A report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation

 

by Tim O’Hare, Lesleigh Force, Lung Wong and Donald Irving

 

  

 

 

December 2006


RIRDC Publication No 05/…
RIRDC Project No DAQ-307A

 

 

© 2005  Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation.

All rights reserved.  

  

ISBN 0 642 (…RIRDC to assign)
ISSN 1440-6845

 

Anti-cancer Potential of Asian Brassicas – Glucosinolates and Chemoprevention

Publication No. 05/

Project No. DAQ307A 

The information contained in this publication is intended for general use to assist public knowledge and discussion and to help improve the development of sustainable industries. The information should not be relied upon for the purpose of a particular matter. Specialist and/or appropriate legal advice should be obtained before any action or decision is taken on the basis of any material in this document. The Commonwealth of Australia, Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, the authors or contributors do not assume liability of any kind whatsoever resulting from any person's use or reliance upon the content of this document.

 

This publication is copyright. However, RIRDC encourages wide dissemination of its research, providing the Corporation is clearly acknowledged. For any other enquiries concerning reproduction, contact the Publications Manager on phone 02 6272 3186.  

 

Researcher Contact Details

Dr Tim O’Hare

DPI&F, Gatton Research Station

LMB 7, MS437, Gatton Qld 4343

07-5466 2257

07-54662208

 

In submitting this report, the researcher has agreed to RIRDC publishing this material in its edited form.

 

RIRDC Contact Details

Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation
Level 1, AMA House
42 Macquarie Street
BARTON   ACT   2600

PO Box 4776 
KINGSTON   ACT   2604                   

 

Phone:   02 6272 4819
Fax:         02 6272 5877
Email:    rirdc@rirdc.gov.au.
Website:                http://www.rirdc.gov.au

 

Published in  2006
 

Foreword

 

Consumption of vegetables belonging to the Brassica family has been associated with a decreased incidence of various cancers, particularly colorectal cancer.  This has been attributed, at least partly, to the glucosinolates which they contain.  Asian vegetables contribute a large number of horticultural species to this family, and along with western vegetables such as broccoli, have potential to provide anti-cancer benefit. 

 

The present project characterised the glucosinolate profiles of a wide range of Asian vegetables, as well as defining at what stage of growth these glucosinolates were present in highest amount.  It became apparent early on that sprouted seed provided the most potent food-source.

 

With this information, it was possible to provide a theoretical estimate of the anti-cancer potential for each vegetable, whether as a sprout or mature. In conjunction with this, the project included trials on the growing conditions of the most promising sprouting species, as well as postharvest stability of glucosinolates once sprouts are placed in refrigeration. Additionally, industry feedback was presented in regard to other issues likely to affect the growing and marketing of sprouts with anti-cancer potential, and which would ultimately impact on the success of a ‘new’ product. 

 

Finally, the report has provided relevant advice in the area of addressing regulatory criteria associated with health claims for food.  This area is currently under change, and the report presents the most up to date advice available at the time of publishing.

 

This project was funded from RIRDC Core Funds which are provided by the Australian Government and from HAL (from industry revenue which is matched by funds provided by the Australian Government).

 

This report, an addition to RIRDC’s diverse range of over 1200 research publications, forms part of our Asian Foods R&D program, which aims to foster the development of a viable Asian Foods industry in Australia.

 

Most of our publications are available for viewing, downloading or purchasing online through our website:

 

         downloads at www.rirdc.gov.au/fullreports/index.html

         purchases at www.rirdc.gov.au/eshop

 

Peter O’Brien

Managing Director

Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation

 

Acknowledgments

 

This project was operated in collaboration with industry partners ‘Green Sprouts’ (Sprout Farms Pty Ltd), ‘Parilla Fresh’ (Parilla Holdings Pty Ltd), and Opti-Grow Pty Ltd.  Wasabi seeds, sprouts and stems were supplied as gifts by Mr Stephen Welsh and Ms Angela Sparrow (Tasmania).

 

HPLC technical assistance was provided by Mr Graham Kerven and Ms Kath Raymont at the University of Queensland.

 

Contents

 

 

Foreword                                                                                                                                  iv

Acknowledgements                                                                                                                     v

Executive Summary                                                                                                                    viii

 

Introduction                                                                                                                             1

Objectives                                                                                                                                2

Methodology

              Approach to determining anti-cancer potential                                                                3

              Other factors of importance                                                                                          3

 

1.     Chapter One – Glucosinolate measurements

         Development of HPLC method for identification of glucosinolates                                          5

         Optimisation of glucosinolate extraction method                                                                  6

 

2.      Chapter Two – Glucosinolate composition of seeds

          Introduction                                                                                                                     8

          Materials and methods                                                                                                      8

                     Glucosinolate extraction and analysis                                                                       8

                     Determination of anti-cancer potential                                                                    8

          Results                                                                                                                            9

          Discussion                                                                                                                        11

          Acknowledgements                                                                                                           12

          Literature cited                                                                                                               12

 

3.      Chapter Three – Glucosinolate composition of sprouted-seed

          Introduction                                                                                                                     14

          Materials and methods

                     Plant material and sprouting conditions                                                                    14

                     Glucosinolate extraction and analysis                                                                       14

                     Determination of anti-cancer potential                                                                    14

          Results 15

          Discussion                                                                                                                        17

          Acknowledgements                                                                                                           17

          Literature cited                                                                                                               18

 

4.      Chapter Four – Glucosinolate composition of mature tissue versus seeds and sprouts

          Introduction                                                                                                                     19

          Materials and methods

                     Plant material                                                                                                       19

                     Glucosinolate extraction and analysis                                                                       19

                     Determination of anti-cancer potential                                                                    19

          Results and Discussion                                                                                                       20

          Literature cited                                                                                                               22

 

5.      Chapter Five – Effect of sprout growth, growing temperature and cultivar on glucosinolate composition using daikon sprouts as a model

          Introduction                                                                                                                     24

          Materials and methods

                     Plant material, sprouting conditions and growing temperature                                   24

                     Glucosinolate extraction and analysis                                                                       24

          Results and Discussion                                                                                                       24

          Acknowledgements                                                                                                           28

          Literature cited                                                                                                               28

 

6.      Chapter Six – Effect of refrigeration on glucosinolate levels in sprouts

          Introduction                                                                                                                     29

          Materials and methods

                     Plant material, sprouting conditions and cold storage                                                29

                     Glucosinolate extraction and analysis                                                                       29

          Results and Discussion                                                                                                        29

          Acknowledgements                                                                                                           32

          Literature cited                                                                                                                32

 

7.      Chapter Seven – Industry assessment of sprouts

          Radish or daikon sprouts                                                                                                   33

          Broccoli sprouts                                                                                                               33

          Kohl rabi sprouts                                                                                                              34

          Rocket sprouts & rocket leaves                                                                                          34

          Wasabi sprouts                                                                                                                 34

          Kale sprouts                                                                                                                     34

          Garden cress sprouts                                                                                                         35

          Chinese broccoli sprouts                                                                                                   35

          Other brassicaceous sprouts                                                                                               35

 

8.      Chapter Eight – Addressing regulatory issues relating to anti-cancer claims

          General level claims                                                                                                         36

          High level health claims                                                                                                    36

          General media & point of sale education material                                                                37

          Conclusions                                                                                                                      37

 

Recommendations                                                                                                                    38

 

Executive Summary

 

The aim of the current project was to investigate the anti-cancer potential of a range of Asian vegetables belonging to the brassica family.  There is increasing evidence that glucosinolates, or more specifically their isothiocyanate hydrolysis products are associated with a lower incidence of certain cancers, particularly those of the gastrointestinal tract (eg. colorectal cancer). 

 

Glucosinolates, of which there are over 120 types, are almost exclusively found in members of the brassica family (or Brassicaceae).  Asian vegetables represent a large number of horticultural brassicaceous species, and therefore hold particular potential as anti-cancer vehicles.  Examples include both members of the Brassica genus (pak choy, tatsoi, choy sum, Chinese broccoli, Chinese mustard, komatsuna, mizuna, Japanese turnip) as well as rocket (Eruca), daikon (Raphanus) and wasabi (Wasabia).

 

Over the last 10-15 years, considerable research has been conducted in relation to the anti-cancer potential of broccoli.  From a range of mature vegetables, broccoli appeared to be one of the best inducers of mammalian detoxification enzymes, also known as phase 2 enzymes.  Phase 2 enzymes act by binding with or inactivating certain carcinogens, making them more readily excretable from the body.

 

The current project optimised an HPLC technique for extraction and identification of glucosinolates, followed by identification of 25 glucosinolates in significant amounts.  Identification was tentatively based on compound molecular weight and published scientific literature, and in the case of 11 glucosinolates, confirmed with standards.

 

It has been already established that different glucosinolates vary in the ability to induce phase 2 enzymes, with the potency of a glucosinolate gauged by its in vitro ability to induce quinone reductase.  Using this information and the concentration of glucosinolates present in various plant tissues, we were able to calculate an anti-cancer index, by which we could estimate the relative potential of different species to induce phase 2 enzymes.

 

Seeds are by far the most concentrated source of glucosinolates, although the presence of erucic acid in brassicaceous seeds has potential health issues in regard to cardiovascular disease.  On the other hand, mature vegetables (which vary greatly in form) tended to have mainly low levels of glucosinolates, increasing the amount required to be consumed to have a chemopreventive effect. Sprouts by comparison have a high level of glucosinolates (however lower than seeds), but the level of erucic acid is negligible making them a good candidate as an anti-cancer product.

 

Sprouts which had the highest anti-cancer potential included daikon, radish, broccoli, rocket, kohl rabi, wasabi, kale, garden cress, and Chinese broccoli.  This varied slightly with mature vegetables, as the plant part varied, as did the mature glucosinolate profiles.  Mature vegetables with highest anti-cancer potential included rocket, broccoli, daikon and wasabi.

 

A complicating issue affecting anti-cancer potential was the question as to how much glucosinolate present in plants gets converted to anti-cancer isothiocyanates when it is eaten.  Unfortunately, cooking is often an effective way of stopping conversion, because the enzymes responsible for conversion is inactivated by heat.  Most of the sprouts studied in the current project would be eaten raw though, so this is less of an issue than for mature vegetables such as broccoli.  Many brassicaceous species however have a secondary issue relating to the conversion of glucosinolates to nitriles, rather than isothiocyanates.  The compound responsible for this is known as epithiospecifier protein (ESP), which can reduce anti-cancer potential by 50-80%.  Fortunately, ESP is not present in all species, including radish and daikon sprouts.

In a closer examination of daikon sprouts, sprout growth stage was found to significantly influence glucosinolate level, with younger sprouts being the most potent.  Growing temperature was found to have less impact on glucosinolate profile, although this varied between cultivar.

 

As sprouts are normally purchased and then stored in a domestic refrigerator, the impact of low temperature on glucosinolate levels for a range of sprouts was examined.  In most cases, glucosinolate levels remained stable at 4°C for up to 4 weeks, although glucosinolate levels in rocket sprouts declined significantly after one week.

 

Issues other than anti-cancer potential were also investigated in relation to commercially growing and marketing different species of sprouts.  Important issues included public awareness of a species (how many people are familiar with kohl rabi), seed price and availability, flavour, and growing characteristics.  Of the sprouts identified, the two most promising species were daikon (radish) sprouts and broccoli sprouts, the latter of which is not an ‘Asian’ vegetable.  Daikon sprouts (which are a form of radish sprouts) are presently on the market and are actually sold as ‘radish’ sprouts.

 

The final issue addressed by the current project was regulatory restrictions in regard to what can be claimed on food labelling in regard to health.  Although the regulatory standard is currently under review, producers are likely to be restricted to content claims.  Producers can say that a product is a natural source of glucosinolates, and then list the amount present on a nutrient content label, but they will not be able to say a product is a ‘good’ source of glucosinolates.  This is because the exact amount of glucosinolate required for a physiological effect has not been unequivocally established. Similarly, claims relating to reducing cancer risk are not yet able to be made on food labelling in Australia.


 

 

Introduction 

 

Members of the Brassica family include a wide range of both ‘Asian’ and ‘Western’ horticultural crops (eg. cabbage, mustard, rocket, pak choy, daikon, broccoli), all of which contain compounds known as glucosinolates (Fenwick et al., 1983).  Upon mastication or other forms of ‘injury’, glucosinolates mix freely with the plant enzyme myrosinase to form a number of potential products, including isothiocyanates with anti-cancer potential (Mithen et al., 2000).  The particular isothiocyanates that are formed are dependent on the glucosinolate profile of the plant species, with commonly 3-4 glucosinolates present in any significant degree (Fenwick et al., 1983). 

 

Consumption of Brassica vegetables has been linked to a reduction in the prevalence of certain types of cancer (eg. colorectal cancer).  Both in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that certain isothiocyanates (hydrolysis products of glucosinolates) are potent inducers of phase 2 detoxification enzymes in mammals (Zhang et al., 1992; Faulkner et al., 1998).  Phase 2 enzymes such as glutathione-S-transferase and quinone reductase promote the metabolism and excretion of potential carcinogens (Johnson et al., 1994). 

 

Glucosinolate concentration is usually highest in the seed (Mithen et al., 2000), with sprouted-seed of several horticultural Brassicaceae found to have 10-100 times the inducer potency of mature field-grown plants (Fahey et al., 1997).  One isothiocyanate that has recently received much publicity for its anti-cancer action is sulphoraphane, a compound that is derived from glucoraphanin, a glucosinolate of high abundance in broccoli (Zhang et al., 1992; Zhang et al., 1994; Nestle, 1997; Brooks et al., 2001).  Both sulphoraphane and broccoli sprouts have been identified as potent inducers of phase 2 enzymes (Zhang et al., 1992; Fahey et al., 1997), with sprout-potency declining exponentially (from a maximum in the seed) over a period of 15 days to the level of mature broccoli heads (Fahey et al., 1997). 

 

Many other isothiocyanates exist with anti-cancer potential (Talalay et al., 1988; Zhang et al., 1992; Rose et al. 2000), located within different members of the Brassica family.   Although there has been a tendency to favour sulphoraphane (and broccoli) research, it is now recognised that it is not the ingestion of sulphoraphane that is important for anti-cancer activity, but the total amount of anti-cancer isothiocyanates accumulating in cells (Zhang and Talalay, 1998).  Put simply, eating twice the amount of an isothiocyanate possessing half the anti-cancer potential of sulphoraphane will provide a similar response to the latter.  With this in mind, a broad range of Brassicaceae vegetables containing glucosinolates other than glucoraphanin may have anti-cancer potential.

 

Asian vegetables comprise of a surprisingly large number of brassicaceous species, some of which may have glucosinolate profiles capable of inducing phase 2 detoxification enzymes.  The current project sought to establish what glucosinolates are present in Asian vegetables available in Australia, and through this to estimate which species may have anti-cancer potential.  Most Asian vegetables purchased in Australia are bought on culinary reasons alone (ie. flavour).  Identifying additional reasons for purchase, such as for health reasons, offers potential to expand sales to consumers who would otherwise have not purchased Asian vegetables.

 

 

Objectives

 

The objective of this project was to identify members of the brassica family (of which Asian vegetables comprise a large number) which could form the basis of industry sales on health rather than culinary issues (ie. flavour), similar to broccoli sprouts in the United States.

 

The emphasis was on identifying species with anti-cancer properties, specifically in relation to chemoprevention, or in other words, identifying species containing compounds that would protect against cancer-causing carcinogens.  The specific compounds of note in the brassica family are the glucosinolates, comprising over 120 types, of which only a relatively small proportion have been screened for anti-cancer potential.

 

Although the scope of this project did not allow us to identify new cancer-fighting compounds, it did allow us to identify the range and levels of compounds with known chemo-preventive properties in Asian vegetables, and in some cases to postulate if a compound was likely to have chemo-preventive activity.  Using this information, we were able to provide a guide as to the anti-cancer potential of most commonly seen Asian vegetables available in Australia.

 

It became apparent early on that seed-sprouts were potentially by far the most potent inducers of anti-cancer compounds (phase 2 enzymes), and hence the project has concentrated in this largely uninvestigated area.

 

Finally, we have tried to provide advice or recommendations on addressing the regulatory issues relating to anti-cancer claims.  This area is presently under change, but the issues refer to health-claims in general in relation to food.  

 

Methodology

Approach to determining anti-cancer potential

 

The current project has been designed to specifically investigate the potential for different brassicaceous species to induce mammalian detoxification enzymes thought to be involved in a chemopreventive role by aiding in the rapid excretion (or inactivation) of carcinogens from the body.  In this regard, a moderate amount of information exists in the scientific literature concerning the relative potencies of different glucosinolates.  The most common method that has been used involves the use of a murine hepatoma cell assay (Hepa1c1c7 murine hepatoma cell assay, Prochaska et al., 1992). This assay compares different glucosinolates by determining the concentration of an individual glucosinolate to double the activity of quinone reductase, a phase 2 enzyme.  Hence, glucosinolates that are required in lower concentration to achieve this are ‘potent’ inducers.  It is from these studies that we have collated quantitative data to rank the various glucosinolates found in Asian vegetables.  For certain glucosinolates, no data exits, and therefore we have had to estimate (based on known similarities between glucosinolates) or omit any anti-cancer potential owing to these glucosinolates when determining overall anti-cancer potential of a species.

 

The ability to induce phase 2 enzymes is consequently based not only on the type of glucosinolate present, but also on its concentration in a given food matrix.  From the scientific literature, it appears that greater consumption of a less potent inducer can have a comparable effect to consuming a lesser amount of a more potent inducer.  Consequently, we have developed a crude ‘Anti-cancer Index’ which takes into account both potency of a glucosinolate, and its concentration.

 

Anti-cancer index = glucosinolate concentration / CD value*

 

*CD value: Concentration of a glucosinolate required to Double the activity of quinone reductase

 

 

As species tend to contain more than one glucosinolate (anything from 1 to 10 at measurable levels, but most often 3 to 4), the assessment of anti-cancer potential becomes slightly more complex.   Studies indicate however that effects of individual glucosinolates are additive, and that there is little synergy acting between individual glucosinolates, hence the calculation becomes:  

 

Anti-cancer index = (G1 / CD1) + (G2/CD2) + (G3/CD3) + etc.

 

In order to calculate the anti-cancer indices for different members of the brassica family, identification and quantification of individual glucosinolates was firstly necessary.  Development of a suitable extraction technique and HPLC quantification method are discussed in Chapter 1.

 

Other factors of importance

 

In general, the active inducer of detoxification enzymes is not the glucosinolate itself, but its hydrolysis product, which is usually an isothiocyanate.  In many cancer studies, it is commonly assumed that 100% of glucosinolates are converted to isothiocyanates, which in many cases is not correct.  In many species, much of the glucosinolate (50-80%) is actually converted to nitriles, which have very little phase 2 enzyme induction activity.  This is because many species contain an enzyme co-factor known as epithiospecifier protein (ESP).  Consequently, the anti-cancer potential of some products can be over-estimated.  In the current report, we have tried to specify wherever possible where this may be occurring.

 

Cooking can also impact on isothiocyanate yield.  Boiling for instance is used to deactivate myrosinase, the enzyme responsible for converting glucosinolate to isothiocyanate.  As a result, many cooked vegetables (as opposed to raw) are less able to produce isothiocyanates as their myrosinase has been heat-inactivated.  Although our gut microflora can convert glucosinolates to isothiocyanates, efficiency is considerably less, in the order of 10-20% that of the plant enzyme.

Another issue to take into account is that some glucosinolates may have potentially negative impacts on health.  For instance, excess progoitrin is associated with inducing goitre, due to interfering with iodine uptake, and an excess of indole glucosinolates may potentially activate phase 1 enzymes and trigger cancer growth.  In the rare occasions where we have found high concentrations of ‘anti-nutritional’ glucosinolates we have specified this.

 

Chapter 1 

 

Glucosinolate measurements

 

Development of HPLC method for identification of glucosinolates

A number of methods have been used in the past to analyse glucosinolate composition of plant material.  Each of these appears to have its own drawback, including loss of glucosinolates during extraction, poor resolution of peaks, difficult extraction methodology, and different columns required for polar and non-polar glucosinolates. 

 

The method used in the current project was based on a HPLC method developed by West et al. (2002), and was the same method chosen for use in the Horticulture Australia project ‘Vital Vegetables 2003-2007’.  The method is a single column approach appropriate to both polar and non-polar glucosinolates, involving reversed-phase separation using hydrophilic endcapped C18-bonded silica and a 50 mM ammonium acetate-methanol gradient mobile phase.  

 

Identification of individual glucosinolates was achieved by HPLC-mass spectrometry to identify molecular weight of compounds reflecting UV at 235 nm.  Plant extracts were passed through HPLC-MS, generating a number of peaks at different elution times.  Each peak corresponded to a different glucosinolate, which was tentatively identified using a combination of molecular weight, previously reported composition, and pure glucosinolate standards where available. 

 

 

Table 1.  Observed glucosinolate elution times using the method of West et al. (2002).

 

Common name

Chemical name

Elution time (min)

Molecular weight

glucoiberin

3-methylsulphinylpropyl

4.4

422

progoitrin

2-hydroxy-3-butenyl

4.8

388

sinigrin

2-propenyl (allyl)

5.2

358

epiprogoitrin

2-hydroxy-3-butenyl

5.7

388

glucoraphanin

4-methylsulphinylbutyl

6.9

436

glucoraphenin

4-methylsulphinyl-3-butenyl

7.3

434

gluconapolieferin

2-hydroxy-4-pentenyl

8.8

402

gluconapin

3-butenyl

9.8

372

glucosinalbin

p-hydroxybenzyl

10.6

424

glucoalyssin

5-methylsulphinylpentyl

11.6

450

glucoiberverin

3-methylthiopropyl

14.0

406

4-hydroxyglucobrassicin

4-hydroxy-3-indolylmethyl

14.7

463

glucocheirolin

3-methylsulphonylpropyl

16.6

438

glucobrassicanapin

4-pentenyl

17.2

386

glucohesperalin

6-methylsulphinylhexyl

17.8

464

glucotropaeolin

benzyl

18.6

408

(not a glucosinolate)

(unknown)

19.9

223&339

glucoerucin

4-methylthiobutyl

20.8

420

glucodehydroerucin

4-methylthio-3-butenyl

21.1

418

glucobrassicin

3-indolylmethyl

24.3

447

glucosiberin

7-methylsulphinylseptyl

27.7

478

gluconasturtiin

2-phenylethyl

28.3

422

4-mercaptobutyl

4-mercaptobutyl

29.4

406

glucoberteroin

5-methylthiopentyl

31.4

434

neoglucobrassicin

1-methoxy-3-indolylmethyl

35.5

477

glucohirsutin

8-methylsulphinyloctyl

38.5

492

Table 1 indicates the elution times for 25 glucosinolates to the best of our knowledge and one unknown compound based on data obtained for over 20 species (pure standards were available for glucosinolates shown in bold).

 

Apart from sinigrin, pure standards were both difficult to attain and expensive, and consequently the level of individual glucosinolates was usually expressed as μmol sinigrin-equivalent per gram.  In order to determine the actual concentration of an individual glucosinolate, equimolar concentration of available standards were compared and conversion factors calculated (Table 2). 

 

Table 2.  Conversion factors for conversion of glucosinolate concentration expressed as sinigrin equivalents into actual glucosinolate concentrations based on integrated absorbance areas for equimolar concentrations (250g/ml) of individual glucosinolate standards.

 

Glucosinolate

Peak Area

Conversion Factor

sinigrin

36073

1.00

glucoiberin

16571

2.18

progoitrin

22876

1.58

epiprogoitrin

17096

2.11

glucoraphanin

11065

3.26

glucoraphenin

11219

3.22

gluconapin

21956

1.64

glucosinalbin

42539

0.85

glucocheirolin

19831

1.82

glucotropeolin

42092

0.86

glucoerucin

23702

1.52

gluconasturtiin

20625

1.75

 

  

Optimisation of glucosinolate extraction method

Boiling-water versus Triple-solvent method

The literature commonly cites two methods of glucosinolate extraction from plant material: triple solvent method and boiling water.   The triple solvent method involves homogenising plant material in a mixture of equal volumes of dimethylsulphoxide, dimethylformamide and acetonitrile at about minus 50°C.  Both methods have been described as yielding essentially identical chromatograms (West et al., 2002).  In the current project, we used the boiling water method for extraction of glucosinolates.

 

Inactivation of myrosinase

In order to prevent hydrolysis of glucosinolates, plant material is boiled to inactivate the endogenous myrosinase enzyme.  Early trials using plastic test-tubes inserted into a boiling water bath, indicated that the plastic tended to insulate the extract solution from the bath, resulting in lower extract temperatures and incomplete inactivation of myrosinase.  Use of glass test-tubes was found to be superior in this regard.  For larger samples (eg. sprouts), direct boiling of beakers on hot-plates was also an efficient means of inactivation.

 

Effect of boiling time on glucosinolate yield was also assessed.  Optimum boiling times were in the vicinity of 5-6 minutes, with less or greater times decreasing glucosinolate yield (Figure 1).  It was found that bulky tissues such as roots (eg. radish, turnip) required rapid grating prior to boiling, due to slow heat-transfer within intact material.

 

  

Figure 1. Effect of boiling time on glucosinolate yield from broccoli seeds (cv. Marathon) (top: 10 minutes; middle: 6 minutes; bottom: 3 minutes).  Glucosinolate peaks (left to right): glucoiberin, glucoraphanin, 4-hydroxyglucobrassicin, glucoerucin.  N.B.: later elution times were due to decreased pressure.

 

Chapter 2  

Glucosinolate composition of seeds

 

Introduction

The following chapter presents data outlining the spectrum of glucosinolates and the individual levels of specific glucosinolates found in the seeds of widely consumed Asian and Western horticultural species in the Brassica family.  Seeds were used as an easily replicable plant organ, with high glucosinolate concentration. Based on this data, the seeds have been ranked for their anti-cancer potential, calculated from reported concentrations of their respective isothiocyanate derivatives to double the activity of the mammalian detoxification phase 2 enzyme, quinone reductase, in Hepa 1c1c7 murine hepatoma cells (Prochaska et al., 1992).  The data provides preliminary indications as to which species may have anti-cancer potential, particularly as sprouted seeds.

           

Materials and methods

Glucosinolate extraction and analysis

Seed samples were taken from a range of ‘Asian’ and ‘Western’ commercially available seeds of the Brassica family.  ‘Asian’ crops included: pak choy (B. rapa var. chinensis), choy sum (B. rapa var. parachinensis), tatsoi (B. rapa var. rosularis), senposai (B. rapa var. perviridis x B. rapa var. pekinensis), komatsuna (B. rapa var. perviridis), Chinese mustard (B. juncea), Chinese broccoli (B. alboglabra), Japanese turnip (B. rapa var. rapifera), kale (B. oleracea var. acephala), Chinese cabbage (B. rapa var. pekinensis), mizuna (B. rapa var. nipposinica), garden cress (Lepidium sativum), rocket (Eruca sativa), and daikon (R. sativus). ‘Western’ crops included: broccoli (Brassica oleraceae var. italica), white cabbage (B. oleracea var. capitata), kohl rabi (B. oleracea var. gongylodes), black mustard (B. nigra), broccoli raab (B. ruvo), watercress (Nasturtium officinalis), red radish (Raphanus sativus), and white mustard (Sinapsis alba).

 

Approximately 0.5 g seed was weighed and boiled in 10 ml water for 5 minutes to inactivate myrosinase-induced degradation of glucosinolates.  Seed was homogenised with an Ultra-Turrax for two minutes and centrifuged for 15 minutes at 13 000 rpm.  The supernatant was collected and filtered through Whatmans No.1 filter paper.  The filtrate was made up to 20 ml with distilled water and refiltered through a 0.2 m syringe filter.

 

Supernatants were analysed for glucosinolates by HPLC-UV and HPLC-MS using a Prevail C18 column as described by West et al. (2002).  The mobile phase was a linear gradient from 100% 50 mM ammonium acetate to 50 mM ammonium acetate-methanol (80:20) in 40 minutes.  The column was operated at ambient temperature with a flow-rate of 1 ml/min.  Preliminary peak identification was based on the molecular weight of the daughter [M-H]- anion released during FAB (fast atom bombardment).  Quantification of individual glucosinolates was based on commercially available high-purity (99.3%) sinigrin.

 

Determination of anti-cancer potential

A crude determination of ‘Anti-cancer potential’ was made based on the ‘CD values’ of the isothiocyanate derivative of the parent glucosinolates present in a species, and the concentration of the individual glucosinolate.  The ‘CD value’ for an isothiocyanate is defined as the concentration (M) of an isothiocyanate required to double quinone reductase (QR) activity (Talalay et al., 1995).  Anti-cancer potential of a species was quantified by dividing the concentration of the isothiocyanate present by its respective CD value.  For example, in broccoli seed, a concentration of 102 mol/gFW glucoraphanin divided by a CD value of 0.4 M for sulphoraphane (derived from glucoraphanin) equates to an anti-cancer potential rating of 255.  When a number of glucosinolates were present in a sample, these values were added together.  The calculation does not take into account potential synergistic interactions between glucosinolate derivatives (Staack et al., 1998) or differences in the relative integrated absorbance areas for glucosinolates of an equimolar concentration of sinigrin (Fahey et al., 1997).

 

CD Values were taken from published studies (Talalay et al., 1988; Zhang et al., 1992; Posner et al., 1994; Tawfiq et al., 1995; Fahey et al., 1997; Faulkner et al., 1998; Zhang and Talalay, 1998; Rose et al., 2000).  Where CD values differed between studies, an average value was taken.  CD values for glucodehydroerucin, gluconapolieferin and epiprogoitrin were estimated to be similar to glucoerucin, glucobrassicanapin, and progoitrin, respectively. 

 

Results

Glucosinolate composition within seeds of individual species is shown in Table 1.  The number of glucosinolates present at a detectable level (>0.1umol/g) ranged from 1 to 10, with a median value of 4. In total, 21 glucosinolates were tentatively identified in the seeds of species studied.  Glucosinolates fell into seven groups: methylsulphinylalkyl (glucosiberin, glucoraphanin, glucohirsutin, glucoalyssin, glucoiberin); methylsulphinylalkenyl (glucoraphenin); methylthioalkyl (glucoerucin, glucoberteroin, glucoiberverin); methylthioalkenyl (glucodehydroerucin); aromatic (glucotropaeolin, gluconasturtiin, glucosinalbin); olefin (sinigrin, gluconapin, glucobrassicanapin, gluconapolieferin, progoitrin, epiprogoitrin) and; indole (4-hydroxyglucobrassicin, glucobrassicin).  Glucoraphanin concentration for our broccoli cultivar (cv. Green Dragon) was 102 mol/gFW, similar to that of cultivars reported to have high glucoraphanin concentration (West et al., 2004).  

 

A ranking of anti-cancer potential for each crop is shown in Figure 1.  Based on constituent glucosinolates and the level present, red radish, daikon, and broccoli had the highest anti-cancer potential of all seeds tested.  Anti-cancer potential of these three vegetables was of a similar level, but more than three times the level of the next highest-ranked vegetable (kohl rabi).  Those with moderate anti-cancer potential included garden cress, rocket, kale, and watercress.  The remaining vegetables had moderate to low anti-cancer potential. 

Figure 1. Estimated anti-cancer potential of seed of Asian and Western vegetables based on ‘CD-values’ of isothiocyanates derived from glucosinolates identified in seed.  Higher values indicate higher anti-cancer potential (ranking without ESP: □; adjusted ranking with ESP: ).

 

 

Table 1.  Glucosinolate composition and concentration (mol/g) of seeds of Asian and Western vegetables.  (glucosinolates in italics are presented as mol sinigrin equivalent/gFW).  CD value corresponds to the cited concentration of isothiocyanate derivatives required to double the activity of the phase 2 enzyme, quinone reductase, in Hepa 1c1c7 murine hepatoma cells.

Glucosinolate

 

CD value

 

red radish

daikon

broccoli

kohl rabi

garden cress

rocket

kale

water cress

Chinese broccoli

cabbage

choy sum

mizuna

senposai

red giant mustard

pak choy

black mustard

Japanese turnip

broccoli raab

tatsoi

Chinese cabbage

komatsuna

white mustard

wasabi

 

glucosiberin

0.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.8

glucoraphenin

0.4

377.9

351.6

 

 

 

4.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

glucoraphanin

0.2-0.8

 

6.5

333.6

86.0

 

10.4

31.9

 

 

 

3.2

5.3

5.4

 

8.9

 

 

 

 

3.7

 

 

 

glucohirsutin

0.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

glucohesperalin

0.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.9

glucoalyssin

0.95

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.2

1.0

 

 

 

 

1.0

3.2

1.0

0.7

 

 

1.0

glucoberteroin

1.7

 

 

2.6

1.9

 

 

1.9

 

 

3.1

1.8

2.8

 

 

 

 

 

1.6

 

1.1

 

 

1.2

glucoiberin

1.8-2.4

 

 

 

30.4

 

 

36.6

 

 

46.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

glucoerucin

2.3

 

 

44.9

12.3

 

110.7

4.9

 

 

 

 

7.1

 

 

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

glucodehydroerucin

2.3

 

8.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

glucotropaeolin

2.0-3.0

 

 

 

 

117.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

glucoiberverin

3.5

 

 

 

1.7

 

 

3.1

 

1.5

7.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

gluconasturtiin

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

106.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.3

 

 

 

 

 

sinigrin

6.1-8.3

 

 

 

2.5

 

 

25.1

 

42.7

22.2

 

 

20.4

84.3

 

71.0

 

1.4

 

 

 

 

33.1

Gluconapin

7.4

 

 

 

1.4

 

 

7.6

1.3

161.1

 

106.9

66.1

61.0

4.6

62.2

 

97.8

50.0

87.9

26.7

60.9

 

1.2

glucobrassicanapin

>15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9.1

4.0

 

 

1.4

 

11.9

16.1

5.2

1.1

4.0

 

1.6

Gluconapolieferin

>15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

 

 

Glucosinalbin

>15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

212.1

 

4-hydroxyglucobrassicin

>15

11.0

9.6

8.9

7.0

 

 

10.6

 

6.3

10.5

5.8

6.4

11.2

6.0

5.2

4.1

6.4

7.7

6.0

9.7

6.0

 

 

progoitrin

47.7

 

 

 

6.5

 

 

18.5

 

 

 

14.5

2.9

97.6

 

9.2

 

2.8

3.4

1.7

10.6

1.1

 

 

epiprogoitrin

47.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.4

 

glucobrassicin

76.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

Neoglucobrassicin

Unknown

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MercaptobutylGS

unknown

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion

The data from the present trial indicates that apart from broccoli, a number of horticultural species within the Brassica family have anti-cancer potential.  In the past, research has concentrated largely on broccoli, as extracts (especially from seed and young sprouts) appeared to have high phase 2 enzyme inducer activity, and broccoli was already consumed in substantial quantities in the Western world (Talalay et al., 1995).  The present data however, indicates that red radish and daikon (white radish) may have similar potential to broccoli, while kohl rabi, garden cress, rocket, kale and watercress have a moderate anti-cancer potential. 

 

Certainly, recent research has indicated the potential for watercress (Rose et al., 2000) and garden cress (Kassie et al., 2002), although little positive mention seems to have been made of radish, daikon, rocket, or kale.  The present study would indicate that the anti-cancer potential of these vegetables warrants further investigation, especially if the glucosinolate profiles in the seed are indicative of profiles that may be attained in sprouted-seed or mature vegetables.  Considering that both the glucosinolate profile and concentration can change or dilute with growth, as well as with the plant organ being studied (Fenwick et al., 1983), it is possible the rank-order of anti-cancer potential could change, and the anti-cancer potential to decline, as is seen in broccoli (Fahey et al., 1997).

 

The current estimates of anti-cancer potential were also based on the assumption that glucosinolates are converted exclusively to isothiocyanates.  This appears to be a widespread assumption, but is apparently not the case for all of the vegetables studied, due to the presence of an enzyme cofactor in some species known as epithiospecifier protein (ESP).  At least in some of the vegetables tested (broccoli, garden cress, cabbage) glucosinolates are autolytically degraded to a large degree (50-80%) by myrosinase and ESP to isothiocyanate nitrile, a compound with no anti-cancer potential (Matusheski, 2004).  By contrast, glucosinolates of daikon and white mustard are converted solely by myrosinase to isothiocyanates.  Considering this, an adjusted rank order of the seeds with highest anti-cancer potential would actually be radish, daikon, broccoli (reduced potency), rocket, kohl rabi and wasabi (Figure 1).  At this stage, we have not confirmed the presence of ESP in the remaining vegetables, but it would undoubtedly further adjust the rank order of anti-cancer potential.  Whatever the case, vegetables containing only low levels of glucosinolates (particularly of sulphinyl and thio-containing glucosinolates) would tend to have limited anti-cancer potential.

 

An additional ‘anti-nutritional’ factor to be considered is the presence of the indole glucosinolates, glucobrassicin and 4-hydroxyglucobrassicin.  Indole compounds such as indole-3-carbinol and indole-3-acetonitrile are formed from the hydrolysis of indole glucosinolates, and these can form mutagenic N-nitroso compounds (Wakabayashi et al., 1985).  In the current study, indole glucosinolates were confined to the Brassica and Raphanus genera (Table 1).  A similar finding has recently been reported by Bennett and co-workers (2004). Also, certain breakdown products from aliphatic glucosinolates containing a -hydroxyl group  (progoitrin, epiprogoitrin and gluconapolieferin) can be goitrogenic (Mithen et al., 2000).  In the current study, excessive progoitrin was found in senposai, and to a lesser degree in kale and choy sum (Table 1).  These factors need to be considered in addition to the anti-cancer potential of isothiocyanates, especially when taken at higher concentration than ‘normal’.

 

The current study indicates that a number of horticultural species apart from broccoli have anti-cancer potential.  Particular vegetables warranting further investigation include red radish and daikon (white radish), seeds from both of which rated similarly to broccoli.  Seed from other vegetables indicating moderate potential included garden cress, rocket, kale, and watercress.  The presence of ESP in some vegetables should be considered as a negative modifier of the anti-cancer potential of certain vegetables, particularly where autolytic degradation is probable, as would be the case with the consumption of uncooked vegetables.  The other issue to consider is the potential ‘anti-nutritional’ effects associated with some glucosinolates, which may accompany the more beneficial glucosinolates present.  Further evaluation of plant extracts is required to confirm anti-cancer potential, with the current study providing a crude estimate of which vegetables are more likely to be beneficial.

Acknowledgements

This study was presented as an oral presentation to the ‘International Symposium on Harnessing the Potential of Horticulture in the Asian-Pacific Region’ held at Coolum, Queensland, 1st-3rd September 2004.  The paper has been published within the conference proceedings as follows: 

O’Hare, TJ, Wong LS and Irving DE, 2005.  Asian and Western horticultural species of the brassica family with anti-cancer potential.  Acta Horticulturae, 694:457-462.

 

Literature cited

Bennett, R.N., Mellon, F.A. and Kroon, P.A. 2004.  Screening crucifer seeds as sources of specific intact glucosinolates using ion-pair high-performance liquid chromatography negative ion electrospray mass spectrometry.  J. Agric. Food Chem. 52: 428-438.

Brooks, J, Paton, V. and Vidanes, G. 2001.  Potent induction of phase 2 enzymes in prostate cells by sulforaphane.  Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 10: 949-954.

Fahey, J.W., Zhang, Y.S. and Talalay, P. 1997.  Broccoli sprouts: an exceptionally rich source of inducers of enzymes that protect against chemical carcinogens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 10367-10372.

Faulkner, K., Mithen, R. and Williamson, G. 1998.  Selective increase of the potential anticarcinogen 4-methylsulphinylbutyl glucosinolate in broccoli.  Carcinogenesis 19: 605-609.

Fenwick, G.R., Heaney, R.K. and Mullin W.J. 1983.  Glucosinolates and their breakdown products in food and food plants.  Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 18: 123-201.

Johnson, I.T., Williamson, G., and Musk, S.S.R. 1994.  Anticarcinogenic factors in plant foods: a new class of nutrients.  Nutr. Res. Rev. 7: 175-204.

Kassie, F., Rabot, S., Uhl. M., Huber, W., Qin, H.M., Helma, C., Schulte-Hermann, R. and Knasmuller, S. 2002.  Chemoprotective effects of garden cress (Lepidium sativum) and its constituents towards 2-amino-3-methyl-imidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ)-induced genotoxic effects and colonic preneoplastic lesions.  Carcinogenesis 23: 1155-1161.

Matusheski, N.V., Juvik, J.A. and Jeffery, E.H. 2004.  Heating decreases epithiospecifier protein activity and increases sulforaphane formation in broccoli.  Phytochemistry 65: 1273-1281.

Mithen, R., Dekker, M., Verkerk, R., Rabot, S. and Johnson, I.T. 2000.  The nutritional significance, biosynthesis and bioavailability of glucosinolates in human foods.  J. Sci. Food Agric. 80: 967-984.

Nestle, M. 1997. Broccoli sprouts as inducers of carcinogen-detoxifying enzyme systems; clinical, dietary, and policy implications.  Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 11149-11151.

Posner, G.H., Cho, C.G., Green, J.V., Zhang, Y.S. and Talalay, P. 1994.  Design and synthesis of bifunctional isothiocyanate analogs of sulforaphane: correlation between structure and potency as inducers of anticarcinogenic detoxification enzymes.  J. Med. Chem. 37: 170-176.

Prochaska, H.J., Santamaria, A.B. and Talalay, P. 1992.  Rapid detection of inducers of enzymes that protect against carcinogens.  Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 2394-2398.

Rose, P., Faulkner, K., Williamson, G. and Mithen, R. 2000.  7-methylsulfinylheptyl and 8-methylsulfinyloctyl isothiocyanates from watercress are potent inducers of phase II enzymes.  Carcinogenesis 21: 1983-1988.

Staack, R., Kingston, S., Wallig, M.A. and Jeffery, E.H. 1998.  A comparison of the individual and collective effects of four glucosinolate breakdown products from Brussels sprouts on induction of detoxification enzymes.  Toxic. Applied Pharmacol. 149: 17-23.

Talalay, P., De Long, M.J. and Prochasta, H.J. 1988.  Identification of a common chemical signal regulating the induction of enzymes that protect against chemical carcinogenesis.  Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85: 8261-8265.

Talalay, P., Fahey, J.W., Holtzclaw, W.D., Prestera, T. and Zhang, Y.S. 1995.  Chemoprotection against cancer by phase 2 enzyme induction.  Toxicol. Lett. 82/83: 173-179.

Tawfiq, N., Heaney, R.K., Plumb, J.A., Fenwick, G.R., Musk, S.R.R. and Williamson, G. 1995.  Dietary glucosinolates as blocking agents against carcinogenesis: glucosinolate breakdown products assessed by induction of quinone reductase activity in murine hepa1c1c7 cells.  Carcinogenesis 16: 1191-1194.

Wakabayashi, K., Nagao, M., Ochiai, Tahira, T., Yamaizumi, Z. and Sugimura, T. 1985.  A mutagen precursor in Chinese cabbage, indole-3-acetonitrile, which becomes mutagenic on nitrite treatment.  Mutation Research 143: 17-21.

West, L., Tsui, I. and Haas, G. 2002.  Single column approach for the liquid chromatographic separation of polar and non-polar glucosinolates from broccoli sprouts and seeds.  J. Chromatography A 966: 227-232.

West, L.G., Meyer, K.A., Balch, B.A., Rossi, F.J., Schultz, M.R. and Haas, G.W. 2004.  Glucoraphanin and 4-hydroxyglucobrassicin contents in seeds of 59 cultivars of broccoli, raab, kohlrabi, radish, cauliflower, Brussels sprouts, kale, and cabbage.  J. Agric. Food Chem. 52: 916-926.

Zhang, Y.S., Kensler, T.W., Cho, C.G., Posner, G.H. and Talalay, P. 1994.  Anticarcinogenic activities of sulforaphane and structurally related synthetic norboryl isothiocyanates.  Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 3147-3150.

Zhang, Y.S. and Talalay, P. 1998.  Mechanism of differential potencies of isothiocyanates as inducers of anticarcinogenic phase 2 enzymes.  Cancer Res. 58: 4632-4639.

Zhang, Y.S., Talalay, P., Cho, C.G. and Posner, G.H. 1992.  A major inducer of anticarcinogenic protective enzymes from broccoli: isolation and elucidation of structure.  Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 2399-2403.

 

Chapter 3 

Glucosinolate composition of sprouted-seed

 

Introduction

The current chapter investigates the glucosinolate profile of a wide range of sprouts (sprouted seed) of species belonging to the Brassicaceae.  Based on the isothiocyanate derivatives of these glucosinolates, and the concentration required for a particular isothiocyanate to induce a known increase in the phase 2 enzyme, quinone reductase, the sprouts have been rated for their anti-cancer potential.  

 

Materials and methods

Plant Material and Sprouting Conditions

Commercially-available seed were sprouted at 20şC on water-soaked tissue under fluorescent light (70 mol.m-2.s-1) to induce chlorophyll formation.  Water was purified via a reverse osmosis system.  Prior to sprouting, seed were soaked for 2 hours to induce imbibition.  Seed were rinsed daily and allowed to drain.   Seed-sprouts were harvested 7-8 days after imbibition.  Species included: broccoli (Brassica oleraceae var. italica), kale (B. oleracea var. acephala), white cabbage (B. oleracea var. capitata), kohl rabi (B. oleracea var. gongylodes), pak choy (B. rapa var. chinensis), choy sum (B. rapa var. parachinensis), tatsoi (B. rapa var. rosularis), senposai (B. rapa var. perviridis x B. rapa var. pekinensis), komatsuna (B. rapa var. perviridis), Japanese turnip (B. rapa var. rapifera), Chinese cabbage (B. rapa var. pekinensis), mizuna (B. rapa var. nipposinica), Chinese mustard (B. juncea), Chinese broccoli (B. alboglabra), black mustard (B. nigra), broccoli raab (B. ruvo), garden cress (Lepidium sativum), rocket (Eruca sativa), daikon and red radish (Raphanus sativus).

 

Glucosinolate extraction and analysis

Intact seed-sprouts (root and shoot, excluding seed-coat) were sampled at 7-8 days.  Approximately 0.4 g sprout was weighed and boiled in 10 ml water for 6 minutes to inactivate myrosinase-induced degradation of glucosinolates.  Sprouts were homogenised with an Ultra-Turrax for two minutes and centrifuged for 15 minutes at 14000 rpm.  The supernatant was collected and filtered through Whatmans No.1 filter paper.  The filtrate was made up to 20 ml with distilled water and refiltered through a 0.2 m syringe filter.

 

Supernatants were analysed for glucosinolates by HPLC-UV and HPLC-MS using a Prevail C18 column as described by West et al. (2002).  The mobile phase was a linear gradient from 100% 50 mM ammonium acetate to 50 mM ammonium acetate-methanol (80:20) in 40 minutes.  The column was operated at ambient temperature with a flow-rate of 1 ml/min.  Preliminary peak identification was based on the molecular weight of the daughter [M-H]- anion released during FAB (fast atom bombardment).  Quantification of individual glucosinolates was initially based on commercially available high-purity (99.3%) sinigrin.  Differences in the relative integrated absorbance areas for glucosinolates of an equimolar concentration of sinigrin were calculated for 12 glucosinolate standards.

 

Determination of anti-cancer potential

A crude determination of ‘Anti-cancer potential’ was made based on the ‘CD values’ of the isothiocyanate derivative of the parent glucosinolates present in a species, and the concentration of the individual glucosinolate.  The ‘CD value’ for an isothiocyanate is defined as the concentration (M) of an isothiocyanate required to double quinone reductase (QR) activity (Talalay et al., 1995).  Anti-cancer potential of a species was quantified by dividing the concentration of the isothiocyanate present by its respective CD value.  For example, in broccoli sprouts, a concentration of 32 mol/gFW glucoraphanin divided by a CD value of 0.4 M for sulphoraphane (derived from glucoraphanin) equates to an anti-cancer potential rating of 80.  When a number of glucosinolates were present in a sample, these values were added together.  The calculation does not take into account potential synergistic interactions between glucosinolate derivatives (Staack et al., 1998), and is based on 100% conversion of glucosinolates to isothiocyanates.

 

CD Values were taken from published studies (Talalay et al., 1988; Zhang et al., 1992; Posner et al., 1994; Tawfiq et al., 1995; Fahey et al., 1997; Faulkner et al., 1998; Zhang and Talalay, 1998; Rose et al., 2000).  Where CD values differed between studies, an average value was taken.  CD values for glucodehydroerucin, gluconapolieferin and epiprogoitrin were estimated to be similar to glucoerucin, glucobrassicanapin, and progoitrin, respectively. 

 

Results

Approximately 17 glucosinolates were identified in 7-8 day old sprouts within the species tested.  The number of glucosinolates present at concentrations greater than 0.1 mol/gFW in any one species ranged from 1-7, with 3 most common (Table 1).  Glucosinolates were divided into eight groups: methylsulphinylalkyl (glucoraphanin, glucoalyssin, glucoiberin); methylsulphinylalkenyl (glucoraphenin); methylthioalkyl (glucoerucin, glucoberteroin, glucoiberverin); methylthioalkenyl (glucodehydroerucin); mercaptoalkyl (4-mercaptobutyl glucosinolate); aromatic (glucotropaeolin); olefin (sinigrin, gluconapin, glucobrassicanapin, gluconapolieferin, progoitrin, epiprogoitrin) and; indole (4-hydroxyglucobrassicin).  An unidentified peak (m/z 223 and 339) was also produced in 10 of the species tested (all B. rapa sprouts, Raphanus sativus, and Lepidium sativum). 

 

 

Figure 1. Estimated anti-cancer potential of sprouts based on ‘CD-values’ of isothiocyanates derived from identified glucosinolates.  Higher values indicate higher anti-cancer potential (ranking without ESP: □; adjusted ranking with ESP: ).

 

Anti-cancer potential based on constituent glucosinolates and the level present for sprouts is shown in Figure 1.  Broccoli and red radish had highest anti-cancer potential (score > 50); kohl rabi and daikon had moderate to high potential (score 20-50), and; kale, rocket, Chinese broccoli, cabbage, garden cress and wasabi had moderate potential (score 5-11).   The remaining species had low potential (score < 2). 

 

Table 1.Glucosinolate composition and concentration (mol/gFW) of seed-sprouts (glucosinolates in italics are presented as mol sinigrin equivalent/gFW).  CD value corresponds to the cited concentration of isothiocyanate derivatives required to double the activity of the phase 2 enzyme, quinone reductase, in Hepa 1c1c7 murine hepatoma cells.

 

 

Glucosinolate

 

CD value

 

red radish

daikon

Broccoli

(Green Dragon)

Broccoli (BroccoSprouts)

kohl rabi

garden cress

rocket

kale

Chinese broccoli

cabbage

choy sum

mizuna

senposai

red giant mustard

pak choy

black mustard

Japanese turnip

broccoli raab

tatsoi

Chinese cabbage

komatsuna

wasabi

glucosiberin

0.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.3

glucoraphenin

0.4

24.5

6.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

glucoraphanin

0.2-0.8

 

 

33.2

18.8

15.7

 

3.7

3.3

1.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

glucohesparalin

0.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.7

glucoalyssin

0.95

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.1

0.3

0.1

 

 

 

glucoberteroin

1.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.2

glucoiberin

1.8-2.4

 

 

 

4.0

4.0

 

 

4.0

 

10.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

glucoerucin

2.3

 

 

6.3

2.6

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

glucodehydroerucin

2.3

9.0

21.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

glucotropaeolin

2.0-3.0

 

 

 

 

 

12.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

glucoiberverin

3.5