International Specialty Supply

Supplying Sprout Companies Throughout the World

 

ISS

820 East 20th Street

Cookeville, TN 38501 USA

931 526 1106

Bob@sproutnet.com

中文版

En espaņol

 

Another Grower Prevents an Outbreak

Sproutnet

International Specialty Supply

November 12, 2001

We received a call from a grower on the US East Coast who had a confirmed positive for Salmonella.  His test was done at 48 hours and was a composite of water taken from three Rota-Techs.  Alfalfa, broccoli and cabbage sprouts were being produced in those drums.  He just used up his next to last bag of alfalfa.  He had been using the broccoli for a couple months and the cabbage for a year.  He bought his alfalfa seed from ISS, and we had sampled every bag and tested it for pathogens using the sprout production method.  He bought his cabbage and broccoli seed from another supplier who said they "tested it" but didn't describe how and provided no documentation.  The grower sanitizes his seed using the 20,000-ppm calcium hypochlorite.  He was using the hold and release program recommended by the FDA, so no product had left his building. 

We may never know if the salmonella came from the seed, a person, or the environment.  For sake of discussion let's assume that it came from the seed.  But if it came from the seed, which seed did it come from?  

If the lot of seed was quite contaminated, it probably came from the broccoli or cabbage.  If it were in the alfalfa, it probably would have been detected when each bag of the entire lot of 880 bags were sampled and tested by ISS. 

If the contamination were localized to one bag of seed, it could have been the broccoli, cabbage, or alfalfa.  If there is light contamination, say, 4 contaminated seeds per kilogram, the odds of finding it if it is only in one bag is only 9.5% (by taking a 25 gram sample).  It needs to be in 7 bags to increase the odds of capture (for detection) to 50%, and in 47 bags to increase the probability of capture to 99%.  So when you are testing 880 bags, it only needs to be in 5% of the bags, at low levels, to get a 99% probability of capture. 

In order to have a 50% probability of capture in one bag the seed would need to be contaminated at the rate of 28 seeds per kilogram, and in order increase to probability of capture in one bag to 99% there would need to be 185 contaminated seeds per kilogram, or about 1 in every 2,700 seeds.  The other alternative is to increase the sample size from 25 grams per bag to 175 grams.

In other words, if only a few bags of a lot are lightly contaminated, there is no reliable way of detecting it other than testing larger quantities of seed.  This is impractical for most seed companies because the seed is not usable after it is tested.  

 This means that even though seed has been properly sampled and tested for pathogens, there may be times when it escapes detection.  If it is contaminated, it is likely to be either extremely lightly contaminated (one contaminated seed per 4 bags) or have light contamination localized in a few bags. 

The chlorine kill step would probably be effective against the extremely lightly contaminated seeds.  If it is localized to one bag, then fortunately the other 879 bags are not contaminated so there would not be a major outbreak.  Just like sanitizing or post testing, the system is not perfect, but it is a very important risk reduction step. 

 In the case of the seed used by the grower who prevented the outbreak, he does not know which seed contained the pathogen.  If the contamination came from the broccoli or cabbage, the industry may have a major problem.  If it came from the alfalfa seed, it probably doesn't.